Christchurch Quake II-Faulty Towers?

“So many lives have been lost as a result of the February 22 earthquake that we must find answers, particularly about why such a significant loss of life occurred in two buildings…” PM John Key*

A tourist snapshot from the Port Hills, now half a metre higher since Canterbury Quake II on 22 February, caught the city in stunning strong seismic motion. From the opposite perspective a worker near the top of the Forsyth Barr building in the central city saw the shockwaves approach and the dominoes falling.

This building, originally the Robt. Jones Building, was an inappropriately tall building for its context-a Ronson lighter stuck up alongside some sawn off stubs. It was built soon after the failed controversial attempt to build an even higher and even more inappropriate tower diagonally opposite in Victoria Square. There will be questions about the way much of its concrete interior staircasing collapsed, with one enterprising staff team abseiling 5 floors to the car park with mountaineering gear stached after the 2001 attacks on New York.

Other tall and quite modern buildings-not Brownlee old dungers-did not perform well. The majority of casualties was in the PGG and CTV Buildings, neither heritage nor stone buildings. The Grand Chancellor hotel, originally designed as an office block, has adopted a Pisa-like lean and there are structural question marks over a lot of other CBD buildings, historic and not.

The recently announced inquiry will examine issues around the built environment in the Christchurch CBD including, but not limited to, the CTV and PGC buildings.

It will also look at the “adequacy of the relevant building codes and standards into the future”. As former Christchurch City Council engineer the late Bryan Bluck said in a graphic 1996 TV documentary*, this is the key to a safer future. Ever since the 1931 Napier earthquake attempts to update the codes and take account of new building technology were too little and too late.

In  a typical Kiwi  belts and braces approach,  which keeps down the rate of judicial unemployment, The Royal Commission will also take into account, but not be limited by, a technical investigation already underway by the Department of Building and Housing into the performance of the Canterbury Television, PGC, Forsyth Barr and Hotel Grand Chancellor buildings.

By way of contrast the earthquake strengthened Canterbury museum, a classic heritage building, came through both big quakes in fine style.

Christchurch is located in a medium risk of earthquakes area while Wellington is shoehorned into a high risk area. Wellington city mothers are suddenly upping the planning for a worst case quake. If Christchurch didn’t get things moving, Friday’s Japanese earthquake certainly has.  The apocalyptic photos and video clips coming out of Japan’s  triple header disaster have caught everyone’s full attention.

There is nothing like witnessing the toss of the cosmic seismic dice elsewhere to concentrate the civic mind.

#Feel free to add a comment below and share this post.

*Blinks   Vid  Earthquake!  Christchurch 1996 leastearthquake/4725585/Earthquake-fault-known-of-since-September 

#Lyall Lukey 15 Mar 2011  My other less serious blog


3 Responses to Christchurch Quake II-Faulty Towers?

  1. lyall1 says:

    [From Grant Hart]
    It seems that there is a major gap in the organisation of resources before a disaster occurs. Obviously services such as the Ambulance, Fire and Police are on hand but private contractors such as crane and digger operators need to know where they stand. They should be on an official call out list and know that when they are working for Civil Defence they will accordingly be indemnified and reimbursed for their efforts. My understanding is that Smith Cranes, for example,have been working in rescue recovery operations, facing some horrendous situations, since the time of the quake purely on the goodwill of Tim Smith. Even though they were desperately needed, apparently some others would not turn out because there was no provision to pay them for their work.

    The same concerns apply to existing charitable organizations such as 0800 Hungry.This is NZ’s largest food bank. They need to know that if required that they can get financial support to enable them to keep their operation functioning. Right now 0800’s cash flow has stopped as a result of the quake and despite the fact that they are continuing to dish out food in the eastern suburbs, the reality is that they need an urgent cash injection of $50,000 to see them through the next two months.They have been declined funding because by the Red Cross because they are not on the “Official List”. We have a classic example, in John MacKenzie, of people being asked to help but having to work outside official recognition. Before our next disaster occurs I believe it is vital that a comprehensive network be established in each centre so that people and companies know they are on the list and can be called on to contribute their particular talents, machinery and other skills to help mitigate the situation.
    Kind regards,
    Grant Hart

  2. Geoff McDonnell says:

    What about the patronising attitude of the Powers That Be who won’t let us into the Inner City to absorb the damage because it might cause us emotional stress! Yet these egotists bend over backwards to allow an Old Slapper who had to pose naked for Playboy,to get some pin money, Rachel Hunter, into the Red Zone to see all the damage!!
    Geoff McDonnell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: